Lab Twelve exists so founders get a fixed quote before they pay, not a ballpark that grows after kickoff.
By Lab Twelve, founder-engineer at Lab Twelve.

Lab Twelve exists because most app projects fail before a line of code ships. Not on technology. On pricing and scope.
You describe an idea. An agency sends a range. You sign. Three weeks later the range is wrong. Features you assumed were included cost extra. The invoice grows. You argue about what "MVP" meant. The project stalls or you pay to make the conflict go away.
That pattern is predictable. Hourly billing rewards ambiguity. Fixed-price contracts without structured scope reward the vendor who writes the vaguest statement of work. Founders lose either way.
Lab Twelve is a studio built around a different sequence: scope first, price second, build third. You talk through what you need at /start. The scope chat turns that conversation into a structured spec. A deterministic pricing engine returns a fixed number from our published offers. You pay that number or you do not. No renegotiation at week two because someone forgot auth was a separate line item.
We are not trying to be the cheapest option on the market. A freelancer on a forum can undercut us. A dev shop in another timezone can quote half our rate and deliver half the product six months late.
We are optimizing for decision speed with low regret. You should know within one conversation whether Lab Twelve is the right fit and what it costs. Our pricing page lists every tier. Those numbers are the numbers. Not "starting at." Not "contact us for a custom quote" on the core packages.
Lab Twelve fits founders and small teams who need a web app shipped on a known budget. Launch pages, internal tools, customer portals, first MVPs. You have a clear problem. You do not have six months and an open-ended retainer to discover it.
It is a poor fit if you need a large enterprise procurement cycle, a team embedded in your office, or exploratory R&D with no definition of done. Say that upfront. We will tell you honestly.
Productized studios trade flexibility for clarity. If your build needs open-ended discovery billed hourly, Lab Twelve is the wrong shop. I would rather lose a lead than take a project we cannot scope and price correctly. That constraint is the point.
See what we have shipped in the examples gallery. When the model fits, start a scope chat.
Get a fixed price in one conversation.
Describe your build and get a fixed price before you pay.
Start an AI scopeShare this post

Most non-technical founders chase a CTO when they actually need v1 in production. Here is how to tell the two problems apart before you give away equity.

A native mobile app costs more, ships slower, and is harder to change than a responsive web app. For most first versions, the web is the correct first bet.

An internal tool serves your team and ships fast. A SaaS product serves strangers and carries ten times the surface. Build the one your evidence supports.
Ready to scope your app?
Describe your build and get a fixed quote before you pay.
Start an AI scope